Home › Forums › FABRIC General Questions and Discussion › Nodes in the same slice using FABNetv6 cannot reach each other
- This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 week, 3 days ago by
Yifan Cai.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 9, 2026 at 10:44 pm #9674
Hello,
I am new to FABRIC, and I am setting up a slice with multiple sites, all using FABNetv6. I checked I was using the data plane address (starting with 2602:fcfb:). However, the ping command says “From 2001:400:2004:12::3 icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: Administratively prohibited” if two servers are from different sites. I have a customized program listening to port 12345, and that cannot be reached even when the client and the server are from the same site. I am wondering what might be wrong. Attached is my topology.
Thank you!
April 9, 2026 at 10:50 pm #9676Hi Yifan,
Could you please share your slice id?
Best,
Komal
April 9, 2026 at 10:55 pm #9677Hi Yifan,
Could you please share your slice id?
Best,
Komal
Hi Komal,
14fac478-d7a7-4d75-ad80-1452ca7fbe0c is my slice ID. Thank you!
Yifan
April 9, 2026 at 11:20 pm #9678A potentially relevant note. Is port mirroring necessary for my use case, where I need to listen on a customized port? I currently do not have this in my slice.
Thank you!
April 9, 2026 at 11:25 pm #9679Hi Yifan,
I’m not sure how the VMs were originally provisioned—whether auto configuration or manual setup was used, or which JupyterHub container was involved.
I checked your MASS VMs and noticed that IPv6 addresses were not assigned to the data plane interfaces and the required routes were missing. I manually configured both VMs by assigning IPv6 addresses and adding the appropriate routes:
mass-0:
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:7:1::2/64 dev enp7s0 sudo ip link set enp7s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:7:1::1 dev enp7s0mass-1:
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:7:1::3/64 dev enp7s0 sudo ip link set enp7s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:7:1::1 dev enp7s0After applying these changes, connectivity between the MASS VMs is working as expected (verified via ping).
I also attempted to access the UTAH and ATLA VMs, but I wasn’t able to SSH using the NOVA keys, so I couldn’t validate their configuration.
Could you please run the following commands on the remaining VMs to configure the data plane interfaces?
UTAH VMs
ut-0:
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:8:d1::2/64 dev enp7s0 sudo ip link set enp7s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:8:d1::1 dev enp7s0ut-1:
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:8:d1::3/64 dev enp7s0 sudo ip link set enp7s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:8:d1::1 dev enp7s0ATLA VMs
atl-0:
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:15:1::2/64 dev enp7s0 sudo ip link set enp7s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:15:1::1 dev enp7s0atl-1:
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:15:1::3/64 dev enp7s0 sudo ip link set enp7s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:15:1::1 dev enp7s0GATECH VMs
gatech-0:
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:11:2::3/64 dev enp7s0 sudo ip link set enp7s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:11:2::1 dev enp7s0gatech-1:
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:11:2::2/64 dev enp7s0 sudo ip link set enp7s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:11:2::1 dev enp7s0WASH VMs
wash-0:
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:a:1::3/64 dev enp7s0 sudo ip link set enp7s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:a:1::1 dev enp7s0wash-1:
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:a:1::2/64 dev enp7s0 sudo ip link set enp7s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:a:1::1 dev enp7s0LOSA VMs
la-0 (uses enp6s0):
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:12:c::3/64 dev enp6s0 sudo ip link set enp6s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:12:c::1 dev enp6s0la-1 (uses enp6s0):
sudo ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:12:c::2/64 dev enp6s0 sudo ip link set enp6s0 up sudo ip -6 route add 2602:fcfb:00::/40 via 2602:fcfb:12:c::1 dev enp6s0Note: The LOSA VMs use
enp6s0instead ofenp7s0for the data plane interface.Please let me know if you need any help with this.
Best,
Komal1 user thanked author for this post.
April 9, 2026 at 11:33 pm #9680Hi Komal,
Thank you so much for your detailed instructions! It works now!
I used the graphical portal to set up the machines. If I understand correctly, for future experiments, setting up the interface(enp6/7s0), IP, and the routes are the things I need to do. Is that correct?
Thank you again!
Yifan
April 10, 2026 at 6:41 am #9681Hi Yifan,
When creating a slice through the Portal, the network configuration needs to be set up manually. However, if you create the slice via the JupyterHub interface (Portal → JupyterHub), the network configuration is handled automatically. You can follow the steps outlined here: https://learn.fabric-testbed.net/knowledge-base/creating-your-first-experiment-in-jupyter-hub/
Best,
Komal1 user thanked author for this post.
April 10, 2026 at 10:00 am #9682Thank you so much!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.