Home › Forums › FABRIC General Questions and Discussion › Error in exchanging ospf protocol routes
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 8 months ago by Paul Ruth.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 19, 2023 at 1:16 am #3969
Hello everyone!
I have a communication problem with the OSPF protocol between nodes with Debian.
For some reason, the protocols used so far (lldp, ospf and lsrp) are not exchanging messages between nodes.
In a topology with three nodes (r1, r2, and r3), I still haven’t been able to exchange routes with OSPF between these nodes.
Each node has 2 NIC_BASIC interfaces, which make up three L2STS networks (net1, net2 and net3).With tcpdump, I was able to verify that the ospf hello messages are arriving on the interfaces, but it does not return anything.
debian@10b0eb56-2206-4903-a9e1-d21504b63e6f-r1:~$ sudo tcpdump -i eth1
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v[v]… for full protocol decode
listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
04:09:50.555914 IP 192.168.3.2 > ospf-all.mcast.net: OSPFv2, Hello, length 44
04:10:00.556029 IP 192.168.3.2 > ospf-all.mcast.net: OSPFv2, Hello, length 44
…Is there any packet filter in the L2STS overlayer? Or on the NIC_Basic interface?
—
Best regards.
EdgardMarch 24, 2023 at 12:31 pm #3986Sorry for the delayed response.
The short answer is that there is no filtering on any of the network services and I have reliably set up OSPF using rocky VMs.
Are you saying that the VM receives the OSPF packets but does not send a response? If so, this seems like an issue with the OSPF config in the VM.
Can you share the notebook you are using?
Paul
March 26, 2023 at 10:48 am #3994Hi Paul,
Thanks for answering me!
Unfortunately, my experiences with SharedNICs have not been very fruitful. Reading some questions that have already been answered, I decided to use Dedicated NICs (NIC_ConnectX_5).
Initially, I’m working on a topology with 3 nodes (routers) with FRRouting and OSPF is already working.
debian@d8698a6b-3042-4429-af77-8389f9ea261e-r3:~$ sudo tcpdump -i eth1.100
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v[v]… for full protocol decode
listening on eth1.100, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
19:01:05.079869 IP 192.168.3.2 > ospf-all.mcast.net: OSPFv2, Hello, length 48
19:01:06.971130 IP 192.168.3.1 > ospf-all.mcast.net: OSPFv2, Hello, length 48Next, I’ll use an FRR competitor for another test. Once I get to that part, I’ll share the notebook with you. I was forced to take a step back to get initial results.
Edgard.
March 29, 2023 at 12:39 pm #4003This is great. Note that I do have FRR/OSPF working without issue using shared/basic NICs. I’m using the Rocky image and FRR docker image. I’m not sure what is preventing your config from working.
The FRR/OSPF notebooks I am putting together are based on a yet-to-be-released version of FABlib. I’ll release the example when the new FABlib is released.
Paul
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.