1. Error in exchanging ospf protocol routes

Error in exchanging ospf protocol routes

Home Forums FABRIC General Questions and Discussion Error in exchanging ospf protocol routes

Tagged: ,

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3969

    Hello everyone!

    I have a communication problem with the OSPF protocol between nodes with Debian.
    For some reason, the protocols used so far (lldp, ospf and lsrp) are not exchanging messages between nodes.
    In a topology with three nodes (r1, r2, and r3), I still haven’t been able to exchange routes with OSPF between these nodes.
    Each node has 2 NIC_BASIC interfaces, which make up three L2STS networks (net1, net2 and net3).

    With tcpdump, I was able to verify that the ospf hello messages are arriving on the interfaces, but it does not return anything.

    debian@10b0eb56-2206-4903-a9e1-d21504b63e6f-r1:~$ sudo tcpdump -i eth1
    tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v[v]… for full protocol decode
    listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
    04:09:50.555914 IP 192.168.3.2 > ospf-all.mcast.net: OSPFv2, Hello, length 44
    04:10:00.556029 IP 192.168.3.2 > ospf-all.mcast.net: OSPFv2, Hello, length 44

    Is there any packet filter in the L2STS overlayer? Or on the NIC_Basic interface?


    Best regards.
    Edgard

    #3986
    Paul Ruth
    Keymaster

      Sorry for the delayed response.

      The short answer is that there is no filtering on any of the network services and I have reliably set up OSPF using rocky VMs.

      Are you saying that the VM receives the OSPF packets but does not send a response?  If so, this seems like an issue with the OSPF config in the VM.

      Can you share the notebook you are using?

      Paul

      #3994

      Hi Paul,

      Thanks for answering me!

      Unfortunately, my experiences with SharedNICs have not been very fruitful. Reading some questions that have already been answered, I decided to use Dedicated NICs (NIC_ConnectX_5).

      Initially, I’m working on a topology with 3 nodes (routers) with FRRouting and OSPF is already working.

      debian@d8698a6b-3042-4429-af77-8389f9ea261e-r3:~$ sudo tcpdump -i eth1.100
      tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v[v]… for full protocol decode
      listening on eth1.100, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
      19:01:05.079869 IP 192.168.3.2 > ospf-all.mcast.net: OSPFv2, Hello, length 48
      19:01:06.971130 IP 192.168.3.1 > ospf-all.mcast.net: OSPFv2, Hello, length 48

      Next, I’ll use an FRR competitor for another test. Once I get to that part, I’ll share the notebook with you. I was forced to take a step back to get initial results.

      Edgard.

      #4003
      Paul Ruth
      Keymaster

        This is great. Note that I do have FRR/OSPF working without issue using shared/basic NICs.  I’m using the Rocky image and FRR docker image.  I’m not sure what is preventing your config from working.

        The FRR/OSPF notebooks I am putting together are based on a yet-to-be-released version of FABlib.  I’ll release the example when the new FABlib is released.

        Paul

      Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.