- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 19 hours, 49 minutes ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Home › Forums › FABRIC General Questions and Discussion › Guaranteed Capacity and Traffic Prioritization across the Sites
Hi FABRIC team,
I’m running experiments across a three-site L2P2P topology and would like to better understand how to ensure guaranteed capacity and prioritize traffic.
Guaranteed Capacity
Is there a way to guarantee specific rates (e.g., 10 Gbps or higher) on L2P2P links? Does the FABRIC L2P2P service currently offer any QoS guarantees? If so, how can we configure or verify them?
Traffic Prioritization
Switch Behavior
Do intermediate switches in the L2P2P path enforce these priority markings, or is the service best-effort by default?
In a nutshell, I’d appreciate any suggestions on how to achieve guaranteed throughput (preferably high-capacity, e.g., 10 Gbps or more) across sites.
Thank you,
Fatih Berkay Sarpkaya
Hi Fatih,
Thank you for your email and detailed questions.
At this time, FABRIC does not currently support guaranteed capacity or QoS prioritization on L2P2P links. The service operates as best-effort by default, and DSCP/ToS or VLAN PCP markings are not currently enforced across the underlying infrastructure.
That said, we are actively working to support guaranteed QoS using Explicit Route Options (ERO) in the L2P2P service. This capability is planned for inclusion in our upcoming Release 1.9, targeted for deployment in late July/early August. It will provide a way to request L2P2P links with specified bandwidth guarantees and rate-limiting.
We will share more details and guidance on how to configure these options as part of the release.
Please feel free to reach out with any further questions in the meantime.
Best regards,
Komal Thareja