1. Komal Thareja

Komal Thareja

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 517 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Issue: servers cannot communicate with each other by L2STS #9422
    Komal Thareja
    Participant

      hi Jianzhang,

      Could you please share your slice details – slice id?

      Best,

      Komal

      in reply to: FABRIC Maintenance Notice – Today at 11:00 AM EST #9421
      Komal Thareja
      Participant

        Maintenance is complete and testbed is operational.

        Best regards,

        The FABRIC Team

        in reply to: CPU model and frequency #9366
        Komal Thareja
        Participant

          @yoursunny – Please consult this page for detailed CPU specifications.

          FABRIC Host Configurations by Site

          Please let us know if you need anything else.

          Best,

          Komal

          in reply to: Help Recovering Slice State to StableOK from StableError #9361
          Komal Thareja
          Participant

            Yes Fatih, you should be able to modify, extend this slice without issues.

            Best,

            Komal

            in reply to: Energy Monitoring of allocations #9351
            Komal Thareja
            Participant

              Hi Jacob,

              Thanks for reaching out. Based on the last discussions around this within our team, Intel RAPL metrics were not driven up into the VM plane, and we decided not to expose energy monitoring (or estimations) via the VM APIs. So at this time, this capability is not available on FABRIC.

              Best regards,
              Komal

              in reply to: Help Recovering Slice State to StableOK from StableError #9350
              Komal Thareja
              Participant

                Hi Fatih,

                I hope you are doing well too, and thank you for reaching out with the detailed description.

                The slice is currently in a StableError state because some slivers encountered failures during the earlier modification attempt and were subsequently closed. This behavior is intentional: FABRIC reports the slice as StableError to preserve visibility into past sliver failures, even after the problematic resources have been cleaned up.

                At this point, since the affected network service has already been closed and no longer appears in the slice, there is no further action required to delete it. Your remaining active resources should continue to function normally, and their operation is not impacted by the slice being in StableError. In other words, this state is informational rather than blocking.

                If you would like to proceed with a clean state, the recommended option is to create a new slice with the desired topology. Otherwise, you may continue using the current slice as-is if the active slivers meet your needs.

                Please let us know if you have any additional questions or if you’d like help recreating the slice or network service.

                Best regards,
                Komal

                in reply to: Slice gone and token issues #9341
                Komal Thareja
                Participant

                  Hi Ilya,

                  Happy New Year to you as well!

                  The slice is still up and running; however, your project has expired, which is preventing the CM from issuing tokens.

                  I’ve requested Michael to extend your project, and that should resolve the issue shortly.

                  Best regards,
                  Komal

                  in reply to: Maintenance Started Tuesday, January 06 – 9:00 AM EST #9338
                  Komal Thareja
                  Participant

                    Maintenance has been completed! Testbed is open to use!

                    Best,

                    Komal

                    in reply to: CPU model and frequency #9322
                    Komal Thareja
                    Participant

                      Hi YoursSunny,

                      Thank you for reaching out! This information is not currently exposed through the API. However, it is documented here and may be helpful:
                      https://learn.fabric-testbed.net/knowledge-base/fabric-site-hardware-configurations/

                      I’ll also raise this with our team to discuss whether we can extend the API to support this in the future.

                      Best regards,
                      Komal

                      Komal Thareja
                      Participant

                        Hi,

                        I’ve fixed NS6 as well. Please try to update your experiment scripts to avoid overwriting the authorized_keys file in the future.

                        Best,
                        Komal

                        in reply to: Issue with L2PTP Tunnels #9270
                        Komal Thareja
                        Participant

                          Hi Fatih,

                          Just wanted to check if you were able to acquire resources for longer duration. Please let us know if we can help in anyway.

                          Best,

                          Komal

                          Komal Thareja
                          Participant

                            Hello Danilo,

                            I’ve restored the keys used by the Control Framework. You should now be able to add your keys via POA.

                            Please be careful not to overwrite any existing keys, and make sure to take a backup of your data beforehand.

                            @yoursunny — great suggestion. So far, we’ve avoided building our own images to reduce additional effort, but we’ll explore ways to either avoid this altogether or introduce a new user without requiring custom OS images.

                            Best regards,
                            Komal

                            in reply to: Issue with L2PTP Tunnels #9237
                            Komal Thareja
                            Participant

                              Hi Fatih,

                              Apologies for the delayed response, but most likely the links you are requesting have been reserved in advance causing your renew to fail. I will look at other reservations today and work with the other users to see if we can get your slice stay up for longer duration. I will keep you posted!

                              Best,

                              Komal

                              in reply to: Date format error when extending slice #9236
                              Komal Thareja
                              Participant

                                Hi Xavier,

                                Until we resolve this on the portal, you can also extend your slice via the JH, checkout this example on Jupyter Hub: fabric_examples/fablib_api/renew_slice/renew_slice.ipynb

                                Best,

                                Komal

                                Komal Thareja
                                Participant

                                  Hi Sourya,

                                  Is this still an issue?

                                  Best,

                                  Komal

                                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 517 total)