Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 3, 2025 at 11:06 pm in reply to: Running Jupyter notebook on JupyterLab doesn’t generate ssh_config file #8882
Hi Zhihe,
This was a bug, a fix has been deployed on the default container. Could you please try running this notebook again?
Thanks,
Komal
Yes please Nirmala – Just keep the following in that file:
This should allow you to delete older examples.
{
"examples": [
{
"url": "default",
"location": "/home/fabric/work"
}
]
}Best,
Komal
September 3, 2025 at 6:36 am in reply to: Guaranteed Capacity and Traffic Prioritization across the Sites #8873Hi Philip,
We discussed this internally, and the minimum supported bandwidth value is 1 Gbps. At this time, we don’t have plans to provide more fine-grained options. If you need to simulate lower bandwidth, we recommend using tools such as
tc
.Best,
Komal
Hi Jacob,
Thank you for sharing the details. I discussed the energy consumption measurement topic with the team earlier today.
As mentioned before, we do not currently support energy consumption measurements on the VMs. The network team also confirmed that such measurement capabilities are not available on the network devices.
For identifying the geolocation of hops, we recommend using the L2PTP (Layer 2 Point-to-Point) network, where the user explicitly defines the network path by specifying the SITEs for each hop. You can then use
fablib.list_sites()
to obtain the geo-coordinates.Please refer to this artifact for guidance on setting up an L2PTP slice:
https://artifacts.fabric-testbed.net/artifacts/7e439627-96be-45e0-ab67-50bb607f06e4Also, regarding the renewal request, I see that it was submitted yesterday. Michael will follow up on that through the ticket.
Best,
Komal
-
This reply was modified 1 month, 1 week ago by
Komal Thareja.
Hi Nirmala,
You don’t need to keep the example notebooks, so please go ahead and remove them.
Could you also take a look at the contents of
/home/fabric/fabric_config/fabric_config.json
? I suspect there may be multiple entries in that file. If so, please delete it as well—this should prevent the older examples from being retained when you log in again.Best,
Komal
Hi Jacob,
At the moment, energy consumption measurements are not passed into the VMs. I’ll bring this up in our planning meeting so it can be considered for inclusion in a future release.
For location information, we currently expose the geo-coordinates for all FABRIC sites, which you can retrieve using
fablib.list_sites()
. One possible approach to determine the location of hops is to map IPs → Sites → Locations.Could you share your slice ID or specify the type of network service you’re using for your WAN experiment?
Best,
Komal
August 25, 2025 at 8:09 pm in reply to: CPU Pinning and Numa Tuning ConnectX_5/ConnectX_6 notebook not working #8848Hi Rasman,
The dataplane was down at MASS. The link has been restored, could you please try running the iPerf3 cells again from the notebook. Apologies for the inconvenience.
Thanks,
Komal
August 25, 2025 at 11:42 am in reply to: CPU Pinning and Numa Tuning ConnectX_5/ConnectX_6 notebook not working #8845Hi Rasman,
I was able to run iperf3 optimized notebook without issues. I am unable to access your notebook. It says Page Not Found.
Could you please share your slice ID?
Thanks,
Komal
August 22, 2025 at 4:44 pm in reply to: JupyterLab Save Error: No Space Left on Device in FABRIC Slice #8841Thank you @yoursunny for sharing the details on how to request more disk space on experiment VMs.
The /home/fabric/work directory (1GB) in the JupyterHub environment serves as persistent storage for code, notebooks, scripts, and other materials related to configuring and running experiments, including the addition of extra Python modules. However, it is not designed to handle large datasets or output files.
Please consider removing un-needed files to avoid this error.
Additionally, if you need more disk space in the Jupyter Hub Container, I recommend setting up your own FABRIC environment on your laptop or machine to run your experiments. This approach will allow you to capture more data and reduce reliance on Jupyter Hub.
Consider one of the following options:
- Running JupyterHub Container locally as described here.
- configuring a local Python environment for the FABRIC API as described here, and run the notebooks locally.
Best,
Komal
-
This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by
Komal Thareja.
August 15, 2025 at 5:11 pm in reply to: Layer 2 Network Topology with Edgecore Wedge100BF-32X P4 Tofino Switch on FABRIC #8828Hi Abdulhadi,
Thank you for sharing the details. I was able to reproduce it and have posted a fix. If you try the Beyond Bleeding Edge JH container, this should work. I plan to update the other JH containers with the fix sometime next week.
Thanks,
Komal
August 15, 2025 at 2:56 pm in reply to: Layer 2 Network Topology with Edgecore Wedge100BF-32X P4 Tofino Switch on FABRIC #8826It appears there may be an issue with
list_nodes
, which could be affecting the display.However, I suspect the P4 switch you requested at SITE is currently unavailable. You can verify this by checking your slice in the Portal. If your slice is in a Dead or Closed state, enable the “Include Dead/Closing Slices” option.
When you click on your slice, you may see an error message such as “insufficient resources.”
Please choose a different site or look at the P4 availability via following code or check from Portal-> Resources Overview screen.
p4_column_name = 'p4-switch_available'
[site2] = fablib.get_random_sites(count=1, filter_function=lambda x: x[p4_column_name] > 0)
Thanks,Komal
August 15, 2025 at 2:47 pm in reply to: NVIDIA-SMI has failed because it couldn’t communicate with the NVIDIA driver. #8825Hi Ajay,
Your slice is currently in a Dead state, and all associated resources have been released.
If you encounter this issue again, please share details of an active slice or VM.
Thanks,
Komal
August 15, 2025 at 2:43 pm in reply to: Layer 2 Network Topology with Edgecore Wedge100BF-32X P4 Tofino Switch on FABRIC #8824Hi,
Could you please share the Slice ID for your slice?
Thanks,
Komal
1 user thanked author for this post.
Hi Arash,
Could you please try deleting the key from the portal and run
fablib.verify_and_configure()
?Thanks,
Komal
1 user thanked author for this post.
August 11, 2025 at 1:45 pm in reply to: Cannot iterate over interfaces on a network in FABlib v1.9.0 #8795Peter’s fix should still work Nirmala!
Thanks,
Komal
-
This reply was modified 1 month, 1 week ago by
-
AuthorPosts