[Komal Thareja]

Hi Kriti,

 

There was an issue on new-y2 where your VMs were being provisioned as it had some leaked VMs. We rebooted the worker node, your slices should work on NEWY. We will also check STAR and WASH as well.

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hello,

Could you please check if the file exists at the specified path using the command: ls /home/fabric/work/re_vit/notebooks/animal-blur-canine-551628.jpg ?

Thanks,
Komal

[Komal Thareja]

The maintenance is complete!

[Komal Thareja]

You are right Greg, this is totally dependent on how much memory is available on the Numa Node on the Host where your VM is launched at the current time.

[Komal Thareja]

@yoursunny

What happens if there are multiple components that are on distinct NUMA sockets?
If you have multiple components, we try to pin the memory for the VM to both the Numa Nodes.

Example: your VM has a ConnectX-5 and GPU both on different sockets, invoking numa_tune would pin the memory to both the sockets provided that the combined available memory on both the sockets >= requested VM RAM.

Is it possible to specify how much RAM to pin to each NUMA socket?
In the current version, this is not supported. We may be limited on this by the underlying OS API as well. But we would explore to improve on this.

If we pin a CPU core or certain amount of RAM onto a NUMA socket, does it prevent other VMs from using the same CPU core or RAM capacity?
Yes, if you have pinned CPUs/Memory to a specific NUMA socket, other VMs cannot use the same cores/memory on that socket.

For CPU pinning, you can explicitly specify how many cores to pin to a Numa Node.

Thanks,
Komal

1 user thanked author for this post.

yoursunny

[Komal Thareja]

No, having lesser memory requested would have better chances or deploying on a relatively less used site would give better success. I checked on the portal GPN seems to be very sparsely used. Please consider requesting the VM there and try with 32G ram.

Upper limit for a VM connected with only one component would map to a single Numa Node. Max limit on memory for a numa node is 64G so exceeding that limit would not work.

Adding more flexibility to this API would help alleviate this issue. Will definitely work on that and keep you updated once that is available.

Thanks,
Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hello Nirmala,

Could you please share your Slice ID to help debug this issue?
Also, could you please provide more details as to what you mean by reservation is not completed? Does the reservation stay in ticketed state or time out. Does it become Active?

Thanks,
Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hello Kriti,

Could you please share your Slice ID to help debug this issue?

Thanks,
Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hello Greg,

node.numa_tune() tries to pin the memory for a VM to the Numa Nodes belonging to the components attached to the VM in the current implementation.

Looking at the sliver details, this sliver has 64G memory allocated. The Numa node for the component attached to this VM is Node 1. In our topology we have 8 Numa Nodes per worker and each is allocated 64G memory. The error message above implies that the requested memory in the above case (64G) is not available on the Numa Node(1) and hence the VM’s memory cannot be pinned to Node(1).


sliver_id: '0764c99c-0e76-4aaa-94de-c291bd2b23f0',
'name': 'compute1-ATLA'
'capacities': '{ core: 16 , ram: 64 G, disk: 500 G}',
'capacity_allocations': '{ core: 16 , ram: 64 G, disk: 500 G}'


Also, in the current version, the API doesn’t allow to pin only a percentage of the memory to the numa node. We will work on adding that capability to serve the memory request better in the next release. Appreciate your feedback!

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Topology update is completed and the maintenance has been lifted.

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Thank you for reporting this issue Manas!

Node2 (STAR) and Node7 (UCSD) are in closed state and hence they do not have a management IP.

Both these nodes failed to provision with the error: Last ticket update: Redeem/Ticket timeout.

Currently investigating it, will keep you posted with our findings.

Also, in the mean while, could you please share your notebook?  Just trying to see if we can reproduce this consistently with your notebook. Haven’t been successful in recreating this problem.

Appreciate your help in making the testbed better!

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Good morning Bruce,

Thank you for sharing your observations. VM provisioning to the worker (mass-w1.fabric-testbed.net) to which the VM was allocated is not working. We are working to resolve it. In the meanwhile, Please consider creating a slice on a different site or a different worker.

Node can be requested on a specific worker by passing in the host field as below:

node1 = slice.add_node(name="Node1", cores=16, ram=32, site="MASS", image='docker_rocky_8', host="mass-w2.fabric-testbed.net")

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

This looks like a bug and would address this. In the meanwhile, I had modified your script to make it run with the latest fablib to get past this issue. Sharing it here, please note the changes around setting interface mode to auto which lets fablib configure IP addresses and also running post_boot_config() this ensures instantiated is set.

 

• This reply was modified 2 years, 11 months ago by Komal Thareja.

[Komal Thareja]

Thank you for sharing your observations! I created a Fabnet slice via JH and was not able to reproduce this problem.

Could you please share the generated graphml file from the following the code?


slice = fablib.get_slice(slice_id="7e6a41e5-ab21-4cc5-9582-4c37e54dc2d8")
slice.get_fim_topology().serialize(file_name="fabnet-slice.graphml")


I can confirm that the slivers for your slices do have Network and Gateway assigned. Enclosing snapshot for slice: 7e6a41e5-ab21-4cc5-9582-4c37e54dc2d8


Reservation ID: 4c9b702b-1346-4fe5-b61e-f5cb7790e75f Slice ID: 7e6a41e5-ab21-4cc5-9582-4c37e54dc2d8
Resource Type: FABNetv4 Notices: Reservation 4c9b702b-1346-4fe5-b61e-f5cb7790e75f (Slice mtu@AMST(7e6a41e5-ab21-4cc5-9582-4c37e54dc2d8) Graph Id:98452967-6246-4517-a030-7d76d7044d05 Owner:shijunxiao@arizona.edu) is in state (Active,None_)
Start: 2023-09-22 19:56:48 +0000 End: 2023-09-23 19:56:47 +0000 Requested End: 2023-09-23 19:56:47 +0000
Units: 1 State: Active Pending State: None_
Predecessors
1f8599bc-68cb-450a-9c49-962d2f5a5b4f
Sliver: {'node_id': 'be2e2e72-5bdd-4301-98aa-bb9e3fe23a56', 'gateway': 'IPv4 subnet: 10.145.7.0/24 GW: 10.145.7.1', 'layer': 'L3', 'name': 'net4', 'node_map': "('bbf6a0a7-8981-4613-b797-0960e7e8ea9d', 'node+amst-data-sw:ip+192.168.42.3-ipv4-ns')", 'reservation_info': '{"error_message": "", "reservation_id": "4c9b702b-1346-4fe5-b61e-f5cb7790e75f", "reservation_state": "Active"}', 'site': 'AMST', 'type': 'FABNetv4', 'user_data': '{"fablib_data": {"instantiated": "False", "mode": "manual"}}'}
IFS: {'node_id': '115b71f3-5369-490a-a6cc-2d16db3cc8f0', 'capacities': '{ unit: 1 }', 'label_allocations': '{ bdf: 0000:e2:0d.1, mac: 0E:4F:18:21:9F:35, ipv4: 10.145.7.2, vlan: 2103, local_name: HundredGigE0/0/0/9, device_name: amst-data-sw}', 'labels': '{ bdf: 0000:e2:0d.1, mac: 0E:4F:18:21:9F:35, ipv4: 10.145.7.2, vlan: 2103, local_name: HundredGigE0/0/0/9, device_name: amst-data-sw}', 'name': 'node-node-nic0-p1', 'node_map': "('bbf6a0a7-8981-4613-b797-0960e7e8ea9d', 'port+amst-data-sw:HundredGigE0/0/0/9')", 'type': 'ServicePort'}

Reservation ID: d88639a0-3062-43d7-83ed-ccbac797ef29 Slice ID: 7e6a41e5-ab21-4cc5-9582-4c37e54dc2d8
Resource Type: FABNetv6 Notices: Reservation d88639a0-3062-43d7-83ed-ccbac797ef29 (Slice mtu@AMST(7e6a41e5-ab21-4cc5-9582-4c37e54dc2d8) Graph Id:98452967-6246-4517-a030-7d76d7044d05 Owner:shijunxiao@arizona.edu) is in state (Active,None_)
Start: 2023-09-22 19:56:48 +0000 End: 2023-09-23 19:56:47 +0000 Requested End: 2023-09-23 19:56:47 +0000
Units: 1 State: Active Pending State: None_
Predecessors
1f8599bc-68cb-450a-9c49-962d2f5a5b4f
Sliver: {'node_id': '8a23d2b8-af6e-4a60-a34a-a9c913b21f30', 'gateway': 'IPv6: 2602:fcfb:1f:2::/64 GW: 2602:fcfb:1f:2::1', 'layer': 'L3', 'name': 'net6', 'node_map': "('bbf6a0a7-8981-4613-b797-0960e7e8ea9d', 'node+amst-data-sw:ip+192.168.42.3-ipv6-ns')", 'reservation_info': '{"error_message": "", "reservation_id": "d88639a0-3062-43d7-83ed-ccbac797ef29", "reservation_state": "Active"}', 'site': 'AMST', 'type': 'FABNetv6', 'user_data': '{"fablib_data": {"instantiated": "False", "mode": "manual"}}'}
IFS: {'node_id': 'b9f78791-6ef0-4e81-9fee-b081a9485676', 'capacities': '{ unit: 1 }', 'label_allocations': '{ bdf: 0000:e2:08.6, mac: 0A:B1:A5:3F:0F:02, ipv6: 2602:fcfb:1f:2::2, vlan: 2068, local_name: HundredGigE0/0/0/9, device_name: amst-data-sw}', 'labels': '{ bdf: 0000:e2:08.6, mac: 0A:B1:A5:3F:0F:02, ipv6: 2602:fcfb:1f:2::2, vlan: 2068, local_name: HundredGigE0/0/0/9, device_name: amst-data-sw}', 'name': 'node-node-nic1-p1', 'node_map': "('bbf6a0a7-8981-4613-b797-0960e7e8ea9d', 'port+amst-data-sw:HundredGigE0/0/0/9')", 'type': 'ServicePort'}

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hi Fraida,

Thank you for reporting this issue. There was a leaked network service. I have cleared it up. Please try your slice again and it should work. Regarding the Slice state, it is a bug and we working on it.

Thanks,

Komal

[Author]

Posts