[Komal Thareja]

Thank you for sharing your slice details! Are you running this as a script?
The difference in behavior could be because of the wait handling in Jupyter Notebook v/s a script.
ModifyOK state indicates that the modify was successful.
You can invoke: slice.update() to move the slice into StableOK state.

Connectivity should work as well. Also, could you please share the script you are running so I can emulate this and address the difference in the behavior of the wait to avoid invoking explicit update.

Thanks,
Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Regarding SSH problem, if the Configure Environment Notebook was ran again assuming the same file name was used for the sliver keys, the sliver private/public keys got overwritten. So the SSH keys in ~/work/fabric_config/ are now different than what is in the VM and thus resulting in SSH failures.

You can verify by ls -ltr ~/work/fabric_config

Thanks,
Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hi Gregory,

Which container are you using? I tried the Ipv4Ext notebook on the “Beyond Bleeding Edge” IPv6Ext from 1.5.3 container and did not see this issue. Also, if you run into this issue, please do not delete the slice. It will help to get the information for the slice for debugging.

Also, please share the output of the following command from your container:
pip list | grep fabric
cat ~/work/fabric_config/requirements.txt

Thanks,
Komal

• This reply was modified 2 years ago by Komal Thareja.

[Komal Thareja]

Also, please check that the correct Project Id is passed in your configure environment notebook.

[Komal Thareja]

@Bruce – It looks like Fablib was unable to refresh your token. Could you please Restart your JH container and try again?
You can stop your container via File -> Hub Control Panel -> Stop My Server; logout and login again.

Thanks,
Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Thank you for reporting this issue James! The new image pulled some newer jupyter packages which required change in the way Widgets are installed/registered. This was causing the failure. I have updated the image and deployed the fix. Please try your notebook and let us know if you still observe errors.

Appreciate your help with this!

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hello Arash,

Please take a look at this article https://learn.fabric-testbed.net/knowledge-base/install-the-python-api/ on setting up FABlib in your local environment instead of using GKE JH containers.

 

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hello Bruce,

Thank you for reporting this issue. The default user for default_centos9_stream is cloud-user instead of centos Our configuration was incorrect and has been updated and the issue has been addressed. Please try a slice and let us know if you still observe any failures or errors.

Also, please note the FABlib uses the default user for default_centos9_stream as centosAny execution of the commands via node.execute() should be pass in the username as cloud-user.

node.execute(‘echo Hello, FABRIC from node hostname -s‘, username=”cloud-user”)

We’ll address this in FABLib as well.

Appreciate your feedback!

Thanks,

Komal

• This reply was modified 2 years ago by Komal Thareja.
• This reply was modified 2 years ago by Komal Thareja.

[Komal Thareja]

Hey Sarah,

Thank you for reporting this issue and using the workaround yesterday. The fix for this issue has been deployed as well.

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hello Manas,

Please check from Portal, Experiments -> Manage SSH Keys to ensure that your bastion keys have not expired. This typically happens when your bastion keys have expired. Please regenerate them and upload to your JH container if they have expired.

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Thank you for sharing the warning message. I have updated the config, could you please try using either 1.4.6 or 1.5.1 container and let me know if the container comes up?

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hi Sarah,

When you have the bleeding edge/beyond bleeding edge container running, could you please share the output of the following commands?


ls -lrt /home/fabric/work/
ls -lrt /home/fabric/work/fabric_config


Also, could you please share the warning message you couldn’t upload to kthare10@renci.org

Thanks,
Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hi Fegping,

Node1: ens7 maps to NIC3 It was configured as below:

NOTE the prefixlen is set to 128 instead of 64.

ens7: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet6 2602:fcfb:1d:2::2 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x0
inet6 fe80::7f:aeff:fe44:cbc9 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 ether 02:7f:ae:44:cb:c9 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 28126 bytes 2617668 (2.6 MB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 2581 bytes 208710 (208.7 KB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

I brought this interface down and re-configured the IP address using the following command:

ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:1d:2::2/64 dev ens7

After this I can ping the gateway as well as other nodes.

root@node1:~# ping 2602:fcfb:1d:2::4
PING 2602:fcfb:1d:2::4(2602:fcfb:1d:2::4) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2602:fcfb:1d:2::4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.186 ms
^C
--- 2602:fcfb:1d:2::4 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.186/0.186/0.186/0.000 ms
root@node1:~# ping 2602:fcfb:1d:2::1
PING 2602:fcfb:1d:2::1(2602:fcfb:1d:2::1) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2602:fcfb:1d:2::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.555 ms
^C
--- 2602:fcfb:1d:2::1 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.555/0.555/0.555/0.000 ms


Node2: IP was configured on ens7 However, mac address for NIC3 02:15:60:C2:7A:AD maps to ens9
I configured ens9 with the command ip -6 addr add 2602:fcfb:1d:2::3/64 dev ens9and can now ping gateway and other nodes.

 

root@node2:~# ping 2602:fcfb:1d:2::1
PING 2602:fcfb:1d:2::1(2602:fcfb:1d:2::1) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2602:fcfb:1d:2::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.948 ms
64 bytes from 2602:fcfb:1d:2::1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.440 ms
^C
--- 2602:fcfb:1d:2::1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1007ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.440/0.694/0.948/0.254 ms
root@node2:~# ping 2602:fcfb:1d:2::2
PING 2602:fcfb:1d:2::2(2602:fcfb:1d:2::2) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2602:fcfb:1d:2::2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.146 ms
64 bytes from 2602:fcfb:1d:2::2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.082 ms
^C
--- 2602:fcfb:1d:2::2 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1010ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.082/0.114/0.146/0.032 ms


Please configure the IPs on other interfaces or share the IPs and I can help configure them.

Thanks,
Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hi Elie,

Could you please share the output of the following commands from your container?

pip list|grep fabric

cat ~/work/fabric_config/requirements.txt

If you have any entries for fabrictestbed-extensions in ~/work/fabric_config/requirements.txt Please remove them and restart your container via File -> Hub Control Panel -> Stop My Server followed by Start My Server.

Thanks,

Komal

[Komal Thareja]

Hi Fengping,

I have rebooted both Node1 and Node2. They should be accessible now. Please set up the IPs as per the mac addresses shared above. Please do let me know if anything else is needed form my side.

Thanks,

Komal

 

 

[Author]

Posts