1. Komal Thareja

Komal Thareja

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 413 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Komal Thareja
    Participant

      Hey Luca,

      I was looking at your slice on SRI and noticed two containers sn-stack-ubuntu-smartnic-cfg-1 and sn-stack-ubuntu-smartnic-p4-1 are restarting. I suspect that could be the reason for traffic issue.

      Your DALL slice is expired so I could not check there.

      The logs in both of them suggest FPGA is not ready.

      ================================================================================
      Created self-signed TLS certificate.
      issuer=CN = localhost
      subject=CN = localhost
      notBefore=Oct 23 18:59:34 2024 GMT
      notAfter=Oct 23 18:59:34 2025 GMT
      X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:
      DNS:smartnic-p4, DNS:localhost, DNS:localhost, IP Address:127.0.0.1, DNS:ip6-localhost, IP Address:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1
      ================================================================================
      Checking for FPGA readiness ... FPGA not ready.


      CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
      388c54840920 smartnic-dpdk-docker:ubuntu-dev "/bin/bash -c -e -o …" 3 minutes ago Up 2 minutes sn-stack-ubuntu-smartnic-dpdk-1
      76f7a24df81d esnet-smartnic-fw:ubuntu-dev "/bin/bash -c -e -o …" 3 minutes ago Up 2 minutes (healthy) sn-stack-ubuntu-smartnic-devbind-1
      b5cca620505d esnet-smartnic-fw:ubuntu-dev "/usr/local/sbin/sn-…" 3 minutes ago Restarting (1) 59 seconds ago sn-stack-ubuntu-smartnic-cfg-1
      9dbb7262d5d6 esnet-smartnic-fw:ubuntu-dev "/bin/bash -c -e -o …" 3 minutes ago Up 2 minutes sn-stack-ubuntu-smartnic-fw-1
      380fcc8ad614 esnet-smartnic-fw:ubuntu-dev "/usr/local/sbin/sn-…" 3 minutes ago Restarting (1) 59 seconds ago sn-stack-ubuntu-smartnic-p4-1
      a3972a1c0ce9 xilinx-labtools-docker:ubuntu-dev "/entrypoint.sh /bin…" 3 minutes ago Up 3 minutes (healthy) sn-stack-ubuntu-smartnic-hw-1
      352f70e7da43 xilinx-labtools-docker:ubuntu-dev "/entrypoint.sh /bin…" 3 minutes ago Up 3 minutes (healthy) 3121/tcp sn-stack-ubuntu-xilinx-hwserver-1
      4295b131ccd8 esnet-smartnic-fw:ubuntu-dev "/bin/bash -c -e -o …" 3 minutes ago Up 3 minutes sn-stack-ubuntu-smartnic-unpack-1
      e9a84041e44e esnet-smartnic-fw:ubuntu-dev "/bin/bash -c -e -o …" 3 minutes ago Up 3 minutes sn-stack-ubuntu-xilinx-sc-console-1

      Dev bind is successful:

      No 'Regex' devices detected
      ===========================
      + lspci -D -kvm -s 0000:1f:00.0
      + grep '^Driver: vfio-pci'
      Driver: vfio-pci
      + lspci -D -kvm -s 0000:1f:00.1
      + grep '^Driver: vfio-pci'
      Driver: vfio-pci
      + touch /status/ok
      + sleep infinity

      Komal Thareja
      Participant

        Correction, FIU has been flashed with bit file compatible with XDMA shell so may not work with ESNet workflow.

        Komal Thareja
        Participant

          Thank you Luca for sharing the slice information. I will investigate this further and keep you posted.

          Could you please extend the slices for atleast upto a week so they don’t expire?

          As a first check, FPGAs on the GATECG, FIU, SRI seem to be flashed with a bitfile compatible with ESNet workflow. I will check about KANS and LOSA and confirm.

          Thanks,

          Komal

          • This reply was modified 5 months, 3 weeks ago by Komal Thareja.
          Komal Thareja
          Participant

            Hi Luca,

            Could you share the sites where you encountered this issue? I tried CLEM, and it worked fine.

            As mentioned here, we collaborate with the experimenter to flash the FPGA with the initial bitstream. We’d like to rule out whether a different bitstream (other than ESnet) was used for flashing the FPGA at the sites where you experienced the problem. Also, if you have the slice up where you see the error, please share your slice ID with us!

            Thanks,
            Komal

            in reply to: Unable to access slice #7672
            Komal Thareja
            Participant

              Hi Kriti,

              It appears that there may be a configuration issue with your experiment. I recommend checking your settings. Based on your slice, there’s a Layer 2 network established between ipnode-1 (192.168.14.1) and n6 (192.168.14.254).

              I can confirm that pinging from ipnode-1 to n6 is successful, which indicates that the underlying Layer 2 network is functioning properly. While you do have a route on ipnode-1 to direct traffic through n6, it seems that the subnet you’re trying to access is not reachable from n6. This issue seems to be specific to your experiment’s configuration, so you may need to troubleshoot on your end.


              [root@ipnode-1 ~]# ip route list
              10.30.6.0/23 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.30.6.233 metric 100
              169.254.169.254 via 10.30.6.11 dev eth0 proto dhcp src 10.30.6.233 metric 100
              192.168.0.0/16 via 192.168.14.254 dev eth1
              192.168.14.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.14.1
              [root@ipnode-1 ~]# traceroute 192.168.28.1
              traceroute to 192.168.28.1 (192.168.28.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
              1 192.168.14.254 (192.168.14.254) 0.422 ms !N 0.386 ms !N *
              [root@ipnode-1 ~]# traceroute 192.168.14.254
              traceroute to 192.168.14.254 (192.168.14.254), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
              1 192.168.14.254 (192.168.14.254) 0.454 ms 0.434 ms 0.423 ms
              [root@ipnode-1 ~]#
              [root@ipnode-1 ~]#
              [root@ipnode-1 ~]#
              [root@ipnode-1 ~]# ping -c 5 192.168.14.254
              PING 192.168.14.254 (192.168.14.254) 56(84) bytes of data.
              64 bytes from 192.168.14.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.069 ms
              64 bytes from 192.168.14.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.062 ms
              64 bytes from 192.168.14.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.102 ms
              64 bytes from 192.168.14.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.066 ms
              64 bytes from 192.168.14.254: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.076 ms

              n6:

              [root@n6 ~]# ip route list
              10.30.6.0/23 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.30.6.69 metric 100
              169.254.169.254 via 10.30.6.11 dev eth0 proto dhcp src 10.30.6.69 metric 100
              192.168.1.0/24 proto ospf metric 20
              nexthop via 192.168.8.2 dev eth3 weight 1
              nexthop via 192.168.12.1 dev eth1 weight 1
              192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.8.2 dev eth3 proto ospf metric 20
              192.168.3.0/24 proto ospf metric 20
              nexthop via 192.168.8.2 dev eth3 weight 1
              nexthop via 192.168.12.1 dev eth1 weight 1
              192.168.4.0/24 via 192.168.12.1 dev eth1 proto ospf metric 20
              192.168.5.0/24 via 192.168.8.2 dev eth3 proto ospf metric 20
              192.168.6.0/24 proto ospf metric 20
              nexthop via 192.168.8.2 dev eth3 weight 1
              nexthop via 192.168.12.1 dev eth1 weight 1
              192.168.7.0/24 via 192.168.12.1 dev eth1 proto ospf metric 20
              192.168.8.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.8.1
              192.168.9.0/24 via 192.168.8.2 dev eth3 proto ospf metric 20
              192.168.10.0/24 via 192.168.8.2 dev eth3 proto ospf metric 20
              192.168.11.0/24 via 192.168.12.1 dev eth1 proto ospf metric 20
              192.168.12.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.12.2
              192.168.13.0/24 via 192.168.12.1 dev eth1 proto ospf metric 20
              192.168.14.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.14.254
              192.168.15.0/24 via 192.168.8.2 dev eth3 proto ospf metric 20
              192.168.16.0/24 via 192.168.12.1 dev eth1 proto ospf metric 20

              [root@n6 ~]# traceroute 192.168.28.1
              traceroute to 192.168.28.1 (192.168.28.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
              connect: Network is unreachable

              Thanks,

              Komal

              in reply to: Unable to access slice #7668
              Komal Thareja
              Participant

                Hi Kriti,

                I created a slice on MASS for a Layer2 Network as well as Layer3 network. Both slices were able to pass traffic.

                This may be something specific to your slice or configuration. Please share your slice id. We can help to take a look but would also recommend checking configuration on your side as well.

                Thank you for letting us know about the portal. We will work on addressing that as well.

                Thanks,

                Komal

                in reply to: Unable to extend slice #7664
                Komal Thareja
                Participant

                  Hi Kriti,

                  Could you please open the Calendar by clicking on the small square shown next to Lease End at to choose the timestamp and then click on Extend?

                  Also, you can extend your slice by following methods as well:

                  • Notebook accessible from Start_here -> Extend Slice Reservation
                  • slice-commander command line utility available in JH container


                  fabric@fall:system-29%$ slice-commander
                  Usage: renew <days> [SliceName1, SliceName2, ...]

                  Please let us know if you run into issues or errors.

                  Thanks,

                  Komal

                  Komal Thareja
                  Participant

                    The maintenance is complete and the new model has been deployed.

                    in reply to: Student facing issue in running hello FABRIC example #7626
                    Komal Thareja
                    Participant

                      Hi Prateek,

                      It seems that the teaching materials are somewhat outdated. Users no longer need to manually complete the steps under “Configure your Jupyter environment.” Instead, they can simply run the latest jupyter-examples-rel1.7.*/configure_and_validate.ipynb notebook to set up their Jupyter Hub environment.

                      If you have any questions or encounter any issues, don’t hesitate to reach out.

                      Thanks,
                      Komal

                      in reply to: Integration of USRPs with FABRIC #7621
                      Komal Thareja
                      Participant

                        I also wanted to mention another option you can utilize: TailScale, which doesn’t require Ext services. You might find the Jupyter example helpful—check it out here.

                        Thanks,
                        Komal

                        in reply to: Integration of USRPs with FABRIC #7618
                        Komal Thareja
                        Participant

                          Hi Sourya,

                          While your request is being reviewed, please consider trying the workaround suggested by @yoursunny here: https://learn.fabric-testbed.net/forums/topic/reaching-the-internet-from-a-fabnet-node/#post-7605

                          Thanks,
                          Komal

                          in reply to: Integration of USRPs with FABRIC #7616
                          Komal Thareja
                          Participant

                            Hi Sourya,

                            We offer FabNetv*Ext services that allow internet access; however, these services require special permission due to the potential security risks they pose. The Project Lead for your project can request these permissions as specified here!

                            Please consider checking the following examples on how to use these services:

                            https://github.com/fabric-testbed/jupyter-examples/tree/main/fabric_examples/fablib_api/create_l3network_fabnet_ipv4ext_manual

                            https://github.com/fabric-testbed/jupyter-examples/tree/main/fabric_examples/fablib_api/create_l3network_fabnet_ipv6ext_manual

                            Feel free to reach out in case you run into issues or have queries.

                            Thanks,
                            Komal

                            Komal Thareja
                            Participant

                              @Tejas – Notebook is not attached. Could you please share it? You may have to change the file extension to .txt

                              in reply to: Unable to assign ip address #7583
                              Komal Thareja
                              Participant

                                Thank you Kim! Could you also please open a terminal on JH and try SSH to the VM using the command displayed above?

                                ssh -i /home/fabric/work/fabric_config/slice_key -F /home/fabric/work/fabric_config/ssh_config rocky@137.222.230.26

                                Thanks,
                                Komal

                                in reply to: Unable to assign ip address #7580
                                Komal Thareja
                                Participant

                                  Hi Kim,

                                  Both of your VMs are accessible via SSH. I can verify with Nova SSH key. I also verified that your SSH keys are pushed in to the VM.

                                  Could you please share the output of the following?
                                  Please run the following snippet in a notebook cell before the configure step.
                                  If this does show the management IPs for the VMs, please try running the configure cells again and let us know if it works.


                                  slice = fablib.get_slice(slice_name)

                                  slice.show();

                                  slice.list_nodes();

                                  Thanks,
                                  Komal

                                Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 413 total)