Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hi Xavier,
Thank you for the feedback! The fix has already been deployed, so you should now be seeing the updated behavior.
From your earlier screenshot, I noticed that the “Lease End at” field was still showing the default time. The portal backend requires this value to include a timezone offset, but the default time displayed on the page does not include it. If the field isn’t modified, the old format is sent to the backend, which causes the request to be rejected.
As a quick test, could you please click the Lease End at field, adjust the time slightly (either using the picker or by typing), and then click Extend again?
Thanks again for your patience and for helping us track this down!
Best,
YaxueHi Xavier,
The problem was due to how the date was being formatted when extending a slice. We’ve just fixed it so it now matches what the system expects. You should be able to extend your slice without any errors now.Feel free to reach out again if anything else comes up!
Best,
Yaxue
Hi Xavier,
Thanks for flagging this! I’ll check into it and let you know once I have an update.
Best,
YaxueHi Yuanjun,
Thanks for reporting this issue! It’s due to a style package update that Portal is using. I’m working on fixing the package dependency issues and the update will be deployed tomorrow, on 01/15. Thanks for your patience and understanding.
Best,
Yaxue
Hi Yuanjun,
Thanks for reporting this issue! It’s due to a style package update that Portal is using. I’m working on fixing it and the update will be deployed on 01/15. Thanks for your patience.
Best,
Yaxue
Hi Justas,
Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. We noticed that both slices you created include sub-interfaces for SmartNICs, which aren’t yet supported by the Portal Slice Viewer. Our team is actively working to expand Portal Slice Viewer’s capabilities to align with JupyterHub and FABLib features.
We’re planning to implement this feature in release 1.8, scheduled for early January 2025. We appreciate your patience and understanding as we work towards this enhancement!
Yaxue
Hi Klodian,
The issue has been fixed. Could you please try again? Thank you for your patience and help!
Best regards,
Yaxue
Hi Klodian,
Thank you for reporting this! There is an issue in Portal Slice Builder and I’ll fix it as soon as possible then let you know.
Best,
Yaxue
Hi Fraida,
Thank you for reporting this issue! I’ll work with our back-end team to update the API to ensure exact match for searching user by email. Also Portal UI regarding the project member/ owner management will be updated to address the existing usability issues in the upcoming FABRIC Portal v1.5.1 release (around September 20, 2023). Please stay tuned!
Thanks again for your help and patience.
Best,
Yaxue
Hi Fraida,
Before you upload the CSV file, does this project have any existing project members? Portal queries the back-end services to search users by the email per the CSV file. Could you please also send the .CSV file to
yaxueguo@renci.orgso that I can try reproducing this issue? Thank you!Yaxue
Thank you Yuvaraj!
It looks like you added a Facility Port without name to the slice topology and this is a bug (portal is designed to provide the Facility Port list to choose from based on the project’s permission tags; and if there is no Facility Port tag for the project, the Facility Port selection should be disabled). Please take a look at this article about FABRIC Facility Port. Also here is the guide article for creating a slice in Portal Slice Builder.
Sorry for the inconvenience this issue caused! I’ll create a ticket and fix this bug soon.
Best,
Yaxue
Thank you for sharing the screenshot. Could you please also send a screenshot of the full slice topology?
